Zouk Legal Counsel

The information contained on this website is of a general nature. The information is not adapted to personal or specific circumstances and therefore cannot be considered as personal, professional or legal advice to the user of the site. In accordance with the Personal Data Processing Act of 08.12.1992, the user reserves the right to consult and, if necessary, correct his personal data. Subject to the provision of an identity document (copy of identity card) sent to ZOUK via a written, dated and signed request, including address and e-mail address, a written copy of your personal data may be requested free of charge. If necessary, you can also request to change incorrect, incomplete or irrelevant information. (B) I INDEMNIFY, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD HARMLESS THE INDEMNIFIED PARTIES AND PROMISE NOT TO INDEMNIFY THE INDEMNIFIED PARTIES AGAINST ALL CLAIMS, DAMAGES, LOSSES AND ACTIONS, INCLUDING REASONABLE ATTORNEYS` FEES, ARISING OUT OF DAMAGES OR LIABILITIES FOR PERSONAL INJURY, INCLUDING DEATH, OR PROPERTY DAMAGE CAUSED BY NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF CONTRACT, ERROR or omission of the indemnified parties or their representatives, subcontractors or personnel of an event or activity related to the Elevation Zouk festival. Lord. Readly Mon, Dec 05, 2022 07:45 CET The independent offer committee of Readly International AB (publ) (“Readly” or the “Company”) unanimously recommends that all shareholders accept the cash offer of Tidnings AB Marieberg (“Bonnier News”). This statement shall be made by Readly`s independent tender committee in accordance with Section II. Bonnier News, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bonnier News Group AB, today announced a public cash offer to Readly shareholders to tender their shares of Readly to Bonnier News (the “Offer”). Under the terms of the offer, Bonnier News is offering SEK 12 in cash per Readly share, representing a value of approximately SEK 455 million of Readly`s issued share capital [1].

The price per share of the offer represents a premium of: 59.3% compared to the closing price of SEK 7,535 for Readly shares on Nasdaq Stockholm on September 2. December 2022, the last trading day before the publication of the offer; 70.0% based on the volume weighted average price of SEK 7.06 per share on Nasdaq Stockholm over the last 60 trading days prior to the announcement of the offer; and 60.1% based on the volume weighted average price of SEK 7.49 per share on Nasdaq Stockholm over the 120 trading days prior to the announcement of the offer. The offer acceptance period is expected to begin on or about December 8, 2022 and end on or about January 13, 2023. Bonnier News reserves the right to extend the period of acceptance of the Offer and to postpone the settlement date. Completion of the Offering is subject, among other things, to Bonnier News becoming the owner of more than 90% of the total number of shares of Readly and receiving all necessary regulatory, regulatory or similar approvals, approvals and decisions, including competition authorities, in each case on terms acceptable to Bonnier News. Bonnier News reserves the right to waive, in whole or in part, all or part of the conditions of performance set out in the context of the Offer. Readly`s Board of Directors has established an independent offering committee to represent Readly in connection with the offer. The independent bid committee consists of Patrick Svensk (chairman), Nicolas Adlercreutz, Malin Stråhle and Stefan Betzold. Nathan Medlock, a member of the board of directors and partner at Zouk Capital LLP[2] (“Zouk Capital”), which owns approximately 4.3% of the number of outstanding shares of Readly, was not involved in the preparation and resolution of the independent offer committee regarding the recommendation of the offer. Readly`s independent bid committee authorized Bonnier News, upon Bonnier News` written request, to conduct limited confirmatory due diligence as part of the preparation of the offer. Except for the information subsequently included in the Company`s Q3 2022 report, Bonnier News has not received any inside information about the Company as part of due diligence.

Further information on the Offer is available in Bonnier News` press release of 5 December 2022 and in the offer document that Bonnier News will publish shortly before the start of the acceptance period. These documents will be available for the offer via a link on the Bonnier News website: www.offer-to-read.com. Readly`s independent offer committee has appointed ABG Sundal Collier AB as financial advisor and Wigge & Partners Advokat KB as legal advisor in connection with the offer. As part of the evaluation of the offer by the independent offer committee, it retained BDO Corporate Finance (“BDO”) to issue a fairness opinion. In the fairness opinion attached to this press release, BDO considers the offer to shareholders to be fair from a financial point of view, taking into account the assumptions and considerations contained in the statement. For the fairness opinion, BDO receives a fixed fee, regardless of the amount of the consideration for the offer, the degree of participation in the offer and the completion of the offer. Since its inception in 2012, Readly`s primary goal has been to build the leader in unlimited digital magazine subscriptions, with a vision to “inspire millions of people to discover and appreciate the power of great editorial content from around the world.” Readly customers have unlimited access to approximately 7,500 magazines and newspapers from more than 1,200 publishers worldwide. In 2022, as indicated in a press release dated March 31, 2022, Readly launched a new revenue growth and cost reduction strategy to further support the Company`s path to profitability. This strategy included an increased focus on investing in product development and innovation, a greater focus on established markets, and redistributing and reducing marketing spend.

You`re the Best Definition of Good Intentions Lyrics

The only thing that might be stranger than the lyrics is Smith`s explanation for the cryptic esoteric poetry of the love song. Collins swears by the story that he put the lyrics together in the blink of an eye during a studio recording session, and laughs at the rumors swirling around the origins of “In the Air Tonight.” Admitting to the BBC that he doesn`t know what the song is about, he said: “What makes it even funnier is when I hear these stories that started many years ago, particularly in America, from someone who came up to me and said, `Did you really see someone drown? I said, “No, that`s not true. If I refuse you what you seek, am I doing it out of fear? Do I exclude my reason and kill what I hold, love Because it seems important where I`m going, I`ll always let you know that the place I`m where I`m is never far away You know, you`re not alone, don`t worry I`ll find you no matter where you are So put a veneer on your hunger Parade the sky under which you are Without careless impressions No one needs more confessions x2 Run through the window Rebellion rejoices in everything you can find to search for something new. Play like the summer wind in the ponds. Dance with the trees merging with the mist behind the field of flowers, as if you were being kissed in the moonlight. Drifting like a drop, the shadows have it well With constant companions, I could go further my nemesis on stilts wins over me Not originally intended for a female performer, the lyrics Steinberg wrote for “Like a Virgin” deal with her own relationship issues. He explained at length to the Los Angeles Times: “I said…

Wyoming Will Witness Requirements

A general residual clause in a will or will containing a general disposition of all of the testator`s property does not exercise the testator`s power of appointment unless that power is expressly mentioned or there is another indication of the intention to include the property subject to that power. Although a will is not required by law, without a will, state laws (called inheritance laws) determine the division of the deceased`s property. However, the result may not coincide with the wishes of the deceased (the deceased), which means that it is usually advisable to draw up a will. A will should be interpreted as transferring all property held by the testator at the time of death, including property acquired after the execution of the will, unless the will indicates a contrary intention. The term “property”, as used in this article, includes both real property and personal property or interest therein and refers to anything that may be the subject of ownership. A Wyoming will can be amended at any time by codicil, an amendment to the will that must be executed in the same way as a will. Once the will is proven, the executor can complete the estate, which includes collecting and protecting property, paying down debts, and then distributing assets. A will drawn up in accordance with W.S. 2-6-114 will be examined without further evidence. Once the will has been deemed valid, the next step is the probate process.

As a general rule, the probate procedure is only necessary if the deceased person only owned property in his or her name. Other assets, also known as “non-estate” ownership, can generally be transferred to the other owner without discount. Not all assets can be distributed in a will. Here are some exceptions: A will ensures that your assets are distributed according to your wishes after your death. Learn about the specific laws that affect wills in Wyoming, how to get a will, how to amend a will, and more. After admission of a will to the estate, any interested person may contest the will or the validity of the will within the period specified in the notification in accordance with W.S. 2-6-122 or 2-7-201. To this end, he must submit a written application to the court where the will was proven, containing his allegations against the validity of the will or against the sufficiency of the evidence, requesting the revocation of the succession procedure. If you die in Wyoming, which is not communal property, your surviving spouse depends on whether or not you have live offspring. Living descendants would be children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren. If you don`t, your spouse will inherit all of your intestate property. (a) In the event of the loss or destruction of a will, the District Court shall collect evidence of its execution and validity in order to establish it.

All testimonies must be recorded in writing and signed by witnesses. No witness who signed a Wyoming will may benefit from it unless there are two (2) witnesses who are not interested and competent for the same, but if the witness without a will would be entitled to a portion of the testator`s estate, the witness may still receive the portion of the amount and value of the specified amount. WY Statistics § 2-6-112. (d) Upon receipt of the decision authorizing the will, the applicant shall, at his own expense, cause to be published once a week for three (3) consecutive weeks in a daily or weekly mass circulation in the county where the estate was notified essentially in the following form: A will has basically the same function, No matter where you live, But there may be variations in status. That`s why it`s important to follow state regulations when filling out your will, otherwise you`ll have an invalid will. Fortunately, if you create your will with LegalZoom, we make sure your will complies with your state`s regulations. However, you may want to know how a will works in your state. In Matter of Estate of Roosa, the Wyoming Supreme Court explained the testamentary capacity standard to make a valid will under Wyoming law: The requirements of Wyoming law to make a valid will can be found in the Wyoming Articles § 2-6-112. If you die without a valid will, you lose control of what happens to your property after your death. Wyoming`s inheritance laws refer to these types of estates as “intestate,” meaning there is no valid will or will. The court will then follow statutory inheritance laws to determine who inherits your assets and how much they receive. If there is no will, the heirs must agree to it and appoint someone to act as executor.

Worldwide Legal Consulting & Co

Analysis Group is one of the largest international business consulting firms with more than 1,000 professionals in 16 offices across North America, Europe and Asia. Since 1981, they have provided economic, financial, health analysis, and strategy expertise to leading law firms, Fortune Global 500 companies, and government agencies around the world. At Affinity, we offer smart, customized business strategies for legal teams. Our holistic approach addresses the role of people, processes and technology in optimizing law firm performance. Affinity`s team of legal experts works hand-in-hand with you to help you better understand and manage your business, from growth strategy to technology selection and everything in between. WORLDWIDE LEGAL CONSULTING & CO, cuenta con una vasta experiencia en Derecho Comercial, Maritimo, Civil y Publico entre otros. Foster your team`s ongoing professional development with powerful training opportunities designed to inform and inspire. Whether it`s through our Affinity Insight membership program or one of our live CLE seminars, your team will receive the kind of hands-on training they need to grow and thrive. Panama City, Panama.Apartado Postal: 0819-01863 El Dorado, Panama.Tel. (507) 380-0469Fax (507) 380-0470 Your Outlook Inbox has 2 quick filters. Click Unread to see all unread emails in your inbox.

Click All to view each email in your inbox. While narrowing down your email list to you. Discover hidden inefficiencies and discover better ways to work. Build more effective teams, streamline operations, compose marketing, and develop plans to ensure the long-term financial health of your business. Where do you need help? If we don`t, we know someone who does. Torres de las Américas, Torre B, Piso 5.Oficina n° 507. As a company that helps so many organizations around the world, Analysis Group knew that the way they handled email and documents was not sustainable given the fast and fast business environment. However, a viable alternative to the company`s existing system was not immediately clear. When Analysis Group began seeking help outside the company, Affinity Consulting Group quickly emerged as a potential solution provider.

Si desea tener mas información sobre nosotros o nuestros servicios, complete el siguiente formulario de contacto. The International Legal Technology Association (ILTACON) conference is a four-and-a-half-day conference with comprehensive peer-led programs, educational content, and in-person networking. Indian. From software selection to implementation to training, we make sure your technology works hard for you, not the other way around. Our customer-centric, vendor-agnostic approach ensures solutions are perfectly tailored to the unique needs of each company we work with. We believe in eliminating clutter and equipping your team with exactly what you need for optimal performance.

Word for Legal Argument

This legal term article is a heel. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. 1) n. a written legal argument, usually in a format prescribed by the courts, in which the legal basis for the claim is set out on the basis of laws, regulations, precedents, legal texts and arguments for the facts in the particular situation. A brief is filed to present arguments for various motions and motions before the courts (sometimes referred to as “points and authorities”), to counter the arguments of opposing counsel, and to provide the judge(s) with reasons to rule in favour of the party represented by the author of the letter. Occasionally, for minor or subsequent legal matters, the judge will declare that a letter or letter of memorandum is sufficient. For appeals and some other important arguments, the brief is linked to color-coded coverages set forth in state and/or federal court rules. Although the term was originally conceived as a short or summary argument (shorter than an oral presentation), legal briefs are ironically often notoriously lengthy. 2) V. summarize a precedent or present a legal argument in writing. Attentive law students “describe” each case in their casebooks, which means extracting the rule of law, reasoning, essential facts, and outcome. 3) v.

give another person a summary of important information. The man agreed with her reasoning and looked at the two beds she wanted. How I ended the argument – the conversation and the interview – and escaped him, I don`t know. For a concrete example in civil proceedings, see Tiffany and Company`s reply brief,[3] Tiffany Inc. v. eBay, Inc., 08-3947-CV (U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit 2008, p. 3). 23, second paragraph): `In any event, if it is argued that eBay`s obligation to take corrective action would prejudice eBay`s activities, that fact cannot relieve it of its legal obligations.

Written statements submitted to the court outlining a party`s legal or factual allegations about the case. In criminal law, the constitutional guarantee that an accused receives a fair and impartial trial. In civil law, the legal rights of a person who is confronted with an adverse act that threatens liberty or property. The legal system that originated in England and is now used in the United States is based on the articulation of legal principles in a historical succession of judicial decisions. Common law principles can be changed by statute. Arguendo is a Latin legal term meaning argumentation. “Suppose, argue that … And similar expressions are used in courtrooms and academic legal circles, and sometimes in other fields, to refer to preliminary, unconfirmed assumptions made at the beginning of an argument to examine their implications. The legal power of a court to hear and decide a particular type of case.

It is also used as a synonym for jurisdiction, i.e. the geographical area over which the court has territorial jurisdiction to rule on cases. An action brought by a plaintiff against a defendant based on a claim that the defendant failed to comply with a legal obligation that caused harm to the plaintiff. He pointed with his own eyes to Cynthia`s help in this argument. A defense attorney might say, “If my client stole the car, saving a life would have justified the theft,” suggesting that it is useless to establish the guilt or innocence of the client as they would have identical legal effects. Instructions from a judge to the jury before it begins deliberations on the substantive questions to be answered and the legislation to be applied. It was obvious that Dick sensed the futility of the argument. And always, in response to every argument, Mary shook her head negatively. The study of the law and structure of the legal system Non-bankruptcy procedure in which a plaintiff or creditor attempts to subject the future wages of a debtor to his claim. In other words, the creditor requests that part of the debtor`s future salary be paid to him for a debt owed to him.

A written and verbatim record of what was said, either in a proceeding such as a trial or in another formal conversation, such as a hearing or an oral government body authorized to resolve disputes. Judges sometimes use the term “court” to refer to themselves in the third person, as in “the court read the pleadings.” Arguendo is a Latin term meaning “to argue” or “for the pleasure of arguing”. When something is argued, the person makes a hypothetical statement for the purpose of reasoning, regardless of whether that statement is actually true or if he or she believes it to be true. Sidney had been persistent and Harriet had outdone the argument in her factual way. A full-time lawyer hired by federal courts to legally defend defendants who cannot afford a lawyer. The judiciary administers the Federal Defence Counsel Programme in accordance with criminal law. But Jeff Rankin has swept away all the arguments with a movement of his big paws. All shares of ownership of the debtor at the time of bankruptcy. The estate technically becomes the temporary legal owner of all of the debtor`s assets. The right as set out in previous court decisions.

Synonymous with precedent. Similar to the common law, which stems from tradition and judicial decisions. A court decision in a previous case with facts and points of law similar to a dispute currently pending in court. Judges generally “follow precedents,” that is, they use principles established in previous cases to decide new cases that have similar facts and raise similar legal issues. A judge will disregard precedents if a party can prove that the previous case was ill-decided or that it differs significantly from the current case. A person who records in extenso what is said in court, usually using a stenographic, stenographic, shorthand or sound recording, and then prepares a transcript of the proceedings upon request. A legal procedure to deal with the debt problems of individuals and companies; in particular, a case filed under one of the chapters of title 11 of the United States Code. “Arguendo”[4], a Belgian law firm based in Hasselt, based its name on this legal term.

The term arguendo often appears in court opinions when a judge wants to express that even if one party`s argument is correct, it will still not win the case. With respect to civil actions in “equity” and not in “law”. In English legal history, courts of “law” could order the payment of damages and could offer no other remedy (see damages). A separate “fairness” tribunal could order someone to do something or stop something (e.g., injunction). In U.S. jurisprudence, federal courts have both legal and just power, but the distinction is always important. For example, a jury trial is generally available in “legal cases,” but not in “fairness” cases.

With Sole Legal and Physical Custody

Even if a parent is given sole physical custody of a minor, he or she does not grant him or her the right to travel without the permission of the court. This issue must be dealt with by the court, as a move can compromise the access rights of the non-custodial parent. In Utah, the court usually issues an injunction that maintains the status quo until the case is decided so that no parent is negatively affected. A parent with sole physical custody has the exclusive right to physically care for the child and to make critical decisions that affect the child`s safety, health and well-being. The court must consider the best interests of the child before granting sole physical custody or custody to one of the parents. Once the court awards sole custody to one parent, that parent has the right to control the physical care of the child without having to consult the other parent. Once a parent has been granted sole custody, they also have the right to make all other decisions about the child`s life without the consent of the other parent. If you have sole custody and joint custody, it means that your child lives with you. You can make day-to-day decisions about school, extracurricular activities, and friends, but you can`t move to another state or change churches without your ex`s consent. Facilitates important decisions because only one parent is legally responsible Children benefit from active relationships with both parents. They also benefit from the collaboration of both parents and the conclusion of compromises to keep their interests in mind. Here are some of the common visiting schedules for sole custody: Generally, sole custody is granted alongside sole physical custody.

When seeking sole custody, most parents assume they are only arguing about sole physical custody. In truth, this is not the only type of custody that parents should consider. Custody must also be taken into account. FULL CUSTODY – When a parent is granted full custody, that parent has legal and physical sole custody with all the rights associated with each of these forms of sole custody. Of course, your child`s best interests are your top priority when going through your divorce. If you`re worried about how to get sole custody in your child`s best interests, we`re here to help you through this difficult process. You can rest easy knowing that your custody case will be handled by the best custody attorney Utah can offer you. Under sole physical custody, the child lives with a parent all the time. This parent has the right to decide on the child`s place of residence and daily activities. The custodial parent can generally travel with the child to, out of state and out of the country, unless ordered by the court. A non-custodial parent is limited to approved court visits.

In California, a non-custodial parent has the right to frequent contact and regular visits with the child. A court may order supervised visitation or no visitation in extreme circumstances of abuse or neglect. The decision must always be made in the best interests of the child. Sole custody is a good option when there are issues that make a parent unfit or unavailable to make informed decisions for the children. But the pursuit of sole custody without a valid reason is likely to be rejected by the family court. A court order granting sole custody to one parent can be discouraging to the other if they are invested in raising the children. See Utah 30-3-10.2 for a more detailed list of factors considered in detention cases. Factors the court considers in determining whether sole custody is appropriate for each situation include: You must specify in your parenting plan the type of custody your family will use. This determines who makes decisions about your children`s education, medical care, religion, extracurricular activities, etc. Other general factors that the court considers in determining the best interests of the child in determining the child`s best interests in the custody decision include those on this list that are relevant to you: For an overview of the custody and access process, read the custody fact sheet (Form FL-314-INFO). This fact sheet is also available in Spanish, Chinese, Korean and Vietnamese. The court grants the non-custodial parent the right to be informed of these important decisions by the custodial parent.

The judge will also normally give the non-custodial parent time to spend time with their child or children. Paul Nathan, a divorce attorney in San Francisco, has written a book to help you make important decisions about divorce and custody. Request a free copy of What Every Woman in California Should Know About Divorce. To make an appointment, contact Paul H. Nathan`s law firm at 866-414-4091. Determining sole custody in your plan is simple. In the app, click the Parent Plan tab. More than two dozen categories of educational regulations will appear. But apart from that, a parent has physical custody of the child. The only time visits do not take place is when it is dangerous for children to be with the parent who does not have custody due to issues such as abuse, neglect, instability or substance abuse. California courts may award sole custody to one parent or joint custody to both parents based on the best interests of the child.

The California Family Code does not promote joint or sole custody. In California, exclusive physical custody is also known as primary physical custody. Sole physical custody includes the right to control the child`s whereabouts, accommodation, school enrolment, afternoon care, medical and dental appointments, vacation, and vacation plans. However, sole physical custody does not automatically give the parent sole custody, which is the right to make all critical decisions about the child`s life. Sole custody should be included in the custody order. The court order should describe each parent`s custody or access rights. In most cases, the court assumes that joint custody is in the best interests of the child. However, the State recognizes a number of different custody arrangements for minors, including exclusive legal and physical regulations; common legal and common physical; single legal and physical common; and joint custody. In addition to custody orders, the judge is also likely to issue support orders.

Keep in mind that a child support order is separate from custody and access, so you can`t refuse to let the other parent see the children just because they don`t make the court-ordered support. And you can`t refuse to pay child support just because the other parent won`t let you see your children. But child support and child custody are linked, because the time each parent spends with the children affects the amount of child support. Click here to learn more about child support. Sole custody (also called sole parental responsibility) is when one parent has full responsibility for making important decisions for the child. The other parent has no say, but often has access rights and the responsibility to pay child support. It is intended for situations where a parent is clearly more likely to make informed decisions. If both parents are available and able to make reasonable decisions, the court is unlikely to grant sole custody.

In particular, the court may consider the following factors in determining whether there is sufficient reason to order legal or physical sole custody: Sometimes parents simply cannot work together. In these cases, sole custody may be the best option. Without sufficient evidence that the other parent`s involvement in decision-making could harm your child, your chances of getting sole custody are slim. Sole custody often appeals to parents because it is easy to make decisions without having to consult anyone. However, this is not a workaround for parents who have difficulty making compromises.

William Blackstone Law

The Rights of Things, Blackstone`s longest volume, deals with property. Most of the text is devoted to land ownership, which is the most valuable type of feudal law on which English land law is based. Movable property was already beginning to eclipse land ownership, but its law lacked the complex feudal context of the common land law and was not treated as comprehensively by Blackstone. It is proposed to draw up a general and complete plan of English laws; derive their history; apply and illustrate its guiding rules and basic principles; and to compare them with the laws of nature and other nations. Of Public Wrongs is Blackstone`s treatise on criminal law. Here, Blackstone, the apologist, takes center stage; He attempts to explain how England`s penal laws were just and merciful, although they later became known as the Bloody Code because of their severity. He admits, however, that “it is a sad truth that among the variety of acts which men may commit daily, no less than one hundred and sixty have been declared criminals by the Act of Parliament without the benefit of the clergy; or, in other words, to be worthy of immediate death.” Blackstone often assured his reader that laws, as written, were not always enforced and that the king`s power of forgiveness could be exercised to correct difficulties or injustices. He wrote in volume 4 of the Commentaries: “Freedom of the press is indeed essential to the nature of a free state: but this consists in not imposing prior restrictions on publications, not in not being subject to censorship for criminal cases when they are published. There is much of what was later called in the comments “Whig history”; [citation needed] the simple and contradictory assertion that England`s present political arrangement represented the optimal state of rational and just government, while at the same time asserting that this optimal state was an ideal that had always existed in the past, despite the many battles in England`s history between overwhelming kings and stubborn parliaments. The following selection comes from the founding constitution. Volume 5 (Doc. 4). Edited by Philip B.

Kurland and Ralph Lerner. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986. You can find the print edition on Amazon or online under the Founder`s Constitution. The frieze on the north wall in the courtroom of the Supreme Court of the United States shows William Blackstone as one of the most influential legal commentators in the history of the world. [116] For decades, the study of comments was mandatory for all first-year law students. Lord Avonmore said of Blackstone: “It was he who first gave the law the air of a science. He found a skeleton and dressed it in life, color and complexion. He kissed the cold statue and thanks to his touch, it became young, healthy and beautiful. Jeremy Bentham, who was a critic of the comments when they were first published, credits Blackstone with “.

Why Should We Legalize Recreational Drugs

Obviously, there are big differences between drugs, both in the effect they have on the user and in their addictive and/or harmful potential. Some drugs that are generally considered addictive are not really addictive, while others that are freely available (such as sugar or nicotine) are both addictive and dangerous to users` health, but are still legal and widely used in society. In light of the above, it does not matter whether drug use – in itself and regardless of how the drugs are obtained – is good or bad: people take drugs, and the war on drugs is a costly, ineffective and extremely harmful policy to stop them. So the question is: how should drug policy be reformed in the face of the failure of the war on drugs? Regulation can and should be realistic and adaptable, evolve over time to reduce damage, and eventually shift all trade to the legal market for years where it can be controlled and taxed. It is necessarily a balancing act: if it is too difficult or too expensive for consumers to legally buy their favorite drugs, the black market will remain. If it`s too easy or too cheap, it could lead to greater addiction. The transition to legal drug markets is possible: the United States did it for alcohol in 1933, when prohibition ended, and still does it for cannabis. One problem is that you could justify everything with such an argument. Theft has certainly existed for as long as human societies have existed, and so have murders, rapes, wars and many other evils. Does that mean that we have the right to continue doing these things, or that we should support them because they have always existed? That doesn`t make sense. Second, the war on drugs cannot be won. People take drugs in the hope of feeling joy and relieving their distress.

These desires do not disappear. People who want drugs are also not deterred by criminal sanctions: a 2014 Interior Ministry report found “no clear link between a country`s tough enforcement against drug possession and the level of drug use in that country.” It is also virtually impossible to stop the supply of such profitable products – a kilo of cocaine can be bought in Colombia for $1,500, but is sold on US roads for 40 times more. Law enforcement suffers from the “balloon effect”: the successful compression of production in one area only moves it to another location. The legalization of marijuana puts the United States in a weak position when it comes to holding other countries accountable for legal agreements. [139] “This is a path that the United States, with its keen interest in international institutions and the rule of law, should follow with great caution,” wrote Wells Bennett, a fellow in national security law at the Brookings Institution, and John Walsh, senior associate in Washington`s Latin America office. [139] One option would be the unconditional and unregulated legalization of all currently illegal drugs. This would allow children to go to a store for a candy bar and a bag of heroin. Obviously, this is a terrible idea.

It is questionable whether and to what extent an unregulated legal drug market would be an improvement over what we currently have – an unregulated illicit market. Should drugs be legalized? What for? Is it time to lift the ban on recreational drugs like marijuana and cocaine? Can drug trafficking be stopped? If so, what would be the best way to reduce consumption? What do you think recreational drugs should legalize or decriminalize? Which of them? Is drug legalization lax on crime? Does drug prohibition complicate police work and divert resources from other, more important issues? Join the discussion and share arguments and resources in the forum below. There is also evidence of successful partial decriminalization in Canada, Switzerland, Portugal and Uruguay. Other countries, such as Ireland, seem to be following a similar path and plan to decriminalize some recreational drugs soon. In addition, at the request of the Presidents of Colombia, Mexico and Guatemala, the United Nations held a special session on drugs on drugs, UNGASS 2016. The objective of this session was to analyze the impact of the war on drugs. Explore new options and establish a new paradigm in international drug policy to prevent the flow of resources to organized criminal organizations. This meeting was seen as an opportunity and even a call for far-reaching reforms of drug legislation.

However, the end result could neither change the status quo nor trigger ambitious reform. It turns out that legalizing drugs is not a public policy option that lends itself to simplistic or superficial debate.

Why Is It Important to Follow Legal Requirements

The secrecy of consumer and employee information is in the news almost every day as internet breaches occur at the world`s largest companies. People want to work and do business with companies that protect their data. It is also important to protect the company`s proprietary data in order to remain competitive in the market. If computers are not secured or passwords are not shared, company data risks stealing information, hacking, and malware. These problems cost businesses millions every year. Simply following security protocols can prevent most problems. If you don`t meet certain compliance requirements, you may still face costly penalties. If you fail to comply with one or more legal obligations, such as: In manufacturing, healthcare, and accounting, you can seriously damage your reputation. It is important to make sure that you understand all the legal obligations that apply to your industry and how you should comply with them. EU law also requires sellers to inform consumers via the European Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) platform via a direct link. ODR, or “Online Dispute Resolution”, is a process that allows EU-based consumers to easily file complaints (about online sales) against companies also based in the EU. This means that operating system requirements may also apply to US companies that have some form of physical presence in the EU.

The rule of law also protects government businesses. Since everyone is subject to the rule of law, this means that the government itself should not overstate its scope when regulating or investigating businesses. The government must also play by the rules. Imagine, for example, that our government could do anything, without restrictions or restrictions on jurisdiction. A company operating in such a climate could face a government shutdown on a whim or excessive taxes or having to pay bribes to get permits to do business. Our rule of law system prevents such abuses. One of the most important reasons why compliance is so important is that you have to comply with the law to the people who rely on your services. Whatever services or products you offer, you need to be able to reassure your target audience that you regulate everyone`s behavior in your workplace and comply with all policies and regulations. Failure to comply with legal compliance requirements can open risks beyond fines.

Businesses also rely on the rule of law to govern their debtor-creditor relationships. And when financial matters don`t go as planned, our legal system allows companies to apply to the court for creditor protection under our bankruptcy law. This allows companies to protect their assets against expropriation or foreclosure by creditors while getting back on track financially. Compliance in companies is often referred to as a “compliance measure” or “compliance standard”. To better understand what is called a compliance measure and what is called a compliance standard and why either of them is important in your industry, it is important that you know the difference between the terms. Another reason why compliance is so important is that it reduces the risk of fines, penalties, downtime, and lawsuits. There are many regulations and laws regarding how your company or organization manages its employees, manages its operations, negotiates, implements safety rules, etc. These requirements are usually governed by a valid and up-to-date document containing the Terms of Use, Terms of Use, or EULA (End User License Agreement).

In the United States, it seems that we have laws, rules and regulations to monitor almost everything. We don`t always like these rules, as they often mean someone telling us what to do or preventing us from doing what we want. But to live in a civil society, we need certain rules that we must follow. Or it could mean following the guidelines of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to ensure non-discriminatory hiring practices. In its business sense, “compliance” refers to a business that complies with its legal obligations, often to protect the health, safety and well-being of others. Simple examples of compliance include acquiring a business license in your city and paying your taxes. The importance of compliance becomes clearer as issues become more complex as your business grows. You have expanded responsibilities regarding your employees, including hiring, firing, discrimination, harassment, security, wages, payroll, and benefits. How you manufacture and sell your products and services may be the responsibility of a government agency, such as a restaurant, which must comply with Ministry of Health guidelines. There are many trade rules and regulations that can help you more than harm.

For example, rules about discrimination and harassment help you create a better work environment for your employees, which can lead to greater employee productivity. Compliance with safety rules helps prevent injuries, fires or evacuations of buildings that affect your profitability. In addition to reading the bare minimum you need to do to comply with your legal obligations, read the business practices offered on the websites of agencies like the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to learn more about ways to strengthen and secure your company`s operations. The privacy policy also includes the option to include a cookie policy (it is necessary to include it if your website or app uses cookies). Policies are customized to your needs and managed remotely by a legal team. For example, some standards for the food industry focus on the entire supply chain to ensure product safety. These would be different from the requirements of the financial services industry, some of which focus on the handling of sensitive data and cybersecurity. Because we have a rule of law system, employers know the rules of the game with respect to their relations with employees, and workers know the rules with respect to their obligations to employers.

Similarly, business partners, board members and members of limited liability companies know what is expected of them in their roles vis-à-vis the company and other members of their organizations. If someone does something that is not allowed, there are legal actions. EU consumer law applies to contracts or other legal relationships between consumers (on the one hand) and traders, businesses and businesses, on the other (B2C). It does not apply to B2B (e.g. a supermarket orders from its fruit supplier) or C2C relationships (e.g. I sell my old bike on eBay). For the company, the end result is profit. It costs money to recruit new people and bring them on board.

The lack of innovation or inefficiency leads to a slowdown in production times and therefore a decrease in sales. Company morale also has a direct impact on employee performance. Happier employees are less likely to call sick or arrive late. People who feel safe at work talk to their colleagues to solve problems faster and more efficiently. So if everyone follows the properly communicated rules and regulations, the team will do better. Thus, the company earns more money. This law comes from the judiciary. Although the courts do not pass laws, they interpret them. This means that the judiciary bases its legal decisions on what is in the constitution and on previous court decisions in similar cases. This is a process called stare decisis, which means “to leave the decision standing” in Latin. Regulatory compliance (compliance with state laws) is different from other aspects of business compliance (e.g., compliance with internal policies and rules).

Similar fines may apply under other state and federal laws. Failure to comply with GDPR requirements can result in fines of up to €20 million (€20 million) or 4% of global annual turnover, whichever is higher. In most cases, failure to comply with these regulations can result not only in significant financial consequences, but also in significant and lasting damage to public trust and your organization`s reputation. It is therefore important to ensure that your company complies with its legal obligations. This way, you can ensure that you comply with your legal obligations (no matter where your customers are), reduce your risk of litigation, and protect your customers by building trust and credibility. Our consent solution simplifies this process by helping you easily store proof of consent and manage consent and privacy settings for each of your users. It allows you to track all aspects of consent (including legal or privacy notices and the consent form presented to the user at the time consent was obtained) and the associated preferences expressed by the user. While disclosure requirements for e-commerce in the United States remain broadly applicable from state to state, in many cases it is common practice to include this information in terms and conditions. Return and refund details are also often included in special content areas of the website/app that are easily accessible from the product description page. Many trade compliance issues revolve around protecting employees. The more employees feel they are working in a fair, professional and safe environment, the more likely they are to stay with you. Even if you don`t harass or discriminate against employees, you can lose valuable employees if you don`t take steps to ensure none of your employees do.

Include policies and procedures in your employee manual that reflect your regulatory compliance obligations. Remember that a policy is only strong if it is enforced. Your policy should not only include the rules, but also set out the procedure for dealing with violations, such as a reprimand and additional training on a first violation and suspension or dismissal for a second.

Why Did Abortion Become Legal in the Us

At the time of the Civil War, a coalition of male doctors — with the support of the Catholic Church and others who wanted to control women`s bodies — led a movement to push state governments to ban abortion at all levels. The male-dominated medical profession wanted to take over the authority of the female-dominated midwifery profession, including the power to offer abortion. In reality, the Puritans were much lighter than was generally believed, and in some ways they were quite progressive when it came to sexual behavior. The Puritans believed that marital sex was important for pleasure and that marriage was a contract of love, not just an economic one. Although premarital and extramarital sex is illegal, it is so common that enforcement is never very strict. The legal documents of the time are full of registered “sexual offenses,” and the proportion of firstborn children born prematurely or out of wedlock was about 40% during the colonial period. Since the Puritans believed that one could fear God without children and that life began when a mother felt her baby kick, their strict religious code did not need to prohibit abortion before the acceleration. After abortion was criminalized in the late Victorian era, it did not become legal again until 1973, when the landmark Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade said all women have the right to terminate a pregnancy until the fetus is viable outside the womb. The decision was made after years of legal, political and religious advocacy on behalf of women and their reproductive health and rights. In the nearly 100 years that abortion was illegal in the United States, women suffered and died from botched abortions, with up to 5,000 women dying each year in the decades before the decision.

According to Roe v. Wade, deaths and hospitalizations resulting from unsafe abortions have effectively ended in this country. When abortion was legal in early America, it was considered at least as safe as giving birth to a child during pregnancy, and today, abortion is considered an extremely safe procedure. But if a woman`s right to abortion is restricted, the operation becomes risky: today, about 68,000 women around the world die each year from unsafe abortions. Together, a coalition of male doctors, supported by the American Medical Association, the Catholic Church and sensationalist newspapers, began campaigning for the criminalization of abortion. By the turn of the century, this coalition had largely succeeded in limiting women`s medical choices. According to Carroll Smith-Rosenberg in his book Disorderly Conduct: Visions of Gender in Victorian America, restricting abortion was a way for male doctors to exercise “clear authority” over their patients. The Victorian anti-abortion movement portrayed women who terminated their pregnancies as unnatural and selfish, undermining the expected, patriotic, and divine role of the American woman – that of wife and mother.

President Bill Clinton signed the Freedom of Clinic Access Act on May 26, 1994. The law makes it a federal crime to physically obstruct the entrance to a clinic or to use violence, threat of violence, or a physical disability such as a sit-in to disrupt, injure, or intimidate clinic workers or women seeking abortions or other reproductive health services. She filed a federal lawsuit under the pseudonym “Jane Roe” to have the Texas law declared unconstitutional. Roe argued that a law prohibiting her from having an abortion violates her constitutional right to privacy. The legal advocacy group If/When/How: Lawyering for Reproductive Justice has launched a campaign to advance the decriminalization of self-directed abortion. If/When/How also provides legal information to people with questions about self-administered abortion and their rights.