The requirements of 49 U.S.C. 31136(a)(1), (2), and (4) apply to this regulatory action. The regulation amends 49 CFR Part 393 to permit the installation of certain safety equipment in the wiper-swept area of the windshield. The Agency concluded that this change will not impact operational safety. Given that the amendments to this Final Rule are primarily technical amendments that make permanent certain exemptions already permitted by the regulatory exemptions, the FMCSA believes that they are welcomed by road transport operators and drivers, and that coercion to violate these exemptions, which is prohibited by Section 31136(a)(5), will not be a problem. The FMCSA must weigh the “costs and benefits” of a proposal before legislating [49 U.S.C. 31136(c)(2)(A), 31502(d)]. The latter rule does not provide for new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The FMCSA determined that this rule does not introduce new requirements for the collection of information under control number OMB 2126-0003 “Inspection, Repair and Maintenance”. This is in response to your letter requesting information on the application of federal safety standards to a “sun visor extension” that is “attached to the existing sun visor of the car, truck or RV using Velcro closures.” I regret the delay in replying. As you can already guess, this article explores the importance of sun visors for driving safety and how you can save money by buying online. You`re wearing the safest motorcycle helmet to protect yourself in the event of an accident, so it makes sense to give up trying a do-it-yourself tint project in favor of a pre-tinted visor.
Not only will you get the shade or hue you want, but you will also have peace of mind that this has been achieved through a process that the manufacturer has tested and knows it is delivering a safe product. However, the prohibitions in /108(a)(2)(A) do not apply to the actions of a vehicle owner who otherwise supplements or modifies his vehicle. Thus, a vehicle owner would not be violating safety law by installing the sun visor extension, even if it would have a negative effect on the safety performance of the sun visor. Q: Isn`t it illegal to have a driver`s sun visor in a commercial vehicle, or is it a violation of a registered Class B or A truck? Thank you – Michael in Florida We would like to recommend some of the best motorcycle helmets with tinted or shaded visors. Take a look at each of these options and choose the one you prefer: The primary purpose of 49 CFR Part 393, “Parts and Accessories Necessary for Safe Operation,” is to ensure that an employer does not operate, induce, or permit the operation of a commercial vehicle unless it is equipped in accordance with the requirements and specifications of that Part. However, nothing in Part 393 shall be construed as prohibiting the use of additional equipment and accessories, print page 65570, unless it conflicts with or is prohibited by the RSFM, provided that such equipment and accessories do not reduce the operational safety of the commercial vehicle on which it is operated (section 393.3). The FMCSA also analyzed this final rule under the Clean Air Act as amended (CAA), Section 176(c) (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.), and implementing regulations issued by the Environmental Protection Agency. Approval of this measure is exempt from the CAA`s general compliance requirement as it does not address direct or indirect emissions of major pollutants.
Whatever your driving experience, dealing with direct sunlight in your field of vision is serious business. This is when a car sun visor is essential. And if you don`t have one, our experts at My Auto Store recommend replacing a car sun visor as soon as possible. When deciding whether or not to drive with a tinted visor, what some people may consider the disadvantages of a tinted visor: For general information, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is authorized by the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act to enact federal motor vehicle safety standards that establish performance requirements for new motor vehicles and automotive equipment. NHTSA does not have the authority to certify or register motor vehicles or automotive equipment that meet our federal standards for motor vehicles. Instead, under the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act (copy attached), each manufacturer of a motor vehicle or equipment is responsible for certifying that their products meet all applicable safety standards. The following represents our opinion based on the information contained in your letter. The 1935 Act, as amended, provides that “the Minister of Transport may prescribe requirements concerning: (1) the qualifications and maximum periods of service of employees of a road transport undertaking and the safe operation and equipment of a road transport undertaking; and (2) the qualifications and maximum periods of service of the personnel of a private road carrier and the equipment standards of a private road carrier, where necessary to promote operational safety. [49 U.S.C. 31502(b)].
Please note that any sun visor intended for use in a motor vehicle is an item of “automotive equipment” and is subject to the Notice and Correction (Recall) Policy of 49 U.S.C. 30118-30120. If a manufacturer or NHTSA determines that the product has a safety-related defect, the manufacturer is responsible for notifying purchasers of the defective automotive equipment part and remedying the problem free of charge. In certain circumstances, the manufacturer of a non-compliant product may also face civil penalties of up to $5,000 for each non-conforming item it produces. Prior to 1998, paragraph 393.60(c) (“Use of Visually Impaired Substances”) prohibited the operation of an anti-technical vehicle “with a label, sticker, sticker or other substances that are impaired by the eyes covering any part of the windshield or windows on either side of the driver`s passenger compartment, except that prescribed stickers may be affixed to the underside of the windshield, provided that no part of a label: Visually impaired stickers, decals or other fabrics may extend more than 4 1/2 inches upwards from the bottom of such a windshield. On March 6, 1995, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) acceded to a petition from the Commonwealth of Kentucky and Heavy Vehicle Electronic License Plate, Inc. Depart from the requirements of paragraph 393.60(c) to permit the installation of an automatic vehicle identification transponder at the top of the windshield of commercial vehicles. After reviewing automotive engineering best practices, federal motor vehicle safety standards, research on the driver`s field of vision, and mechanical commercial vehicle cab design related to the location of interior mirrors and sun visors, the FHWA concluded that mounting a transponder in the approximate center of the top of the windshield would be extremely unlikely to create a situation. which is incompatible with the safe operation of a commercial vehicle. And it was unlikely to affect a driver`s ability to observe nearby objects, such as pedestrians.